Pupil Premium
Pupil premium strategy statement for Mill Lane Primary School
Pupil premium strategy statement for Mill Lane Primary School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2022 to 2023 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School Overview
Detail |
Data |
School name |
Mill Lane Primary School |
Number of pupils in school |
224 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
47.35% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2023-2024 |
Date this statement was published |
01 September 2023 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
31 August 2024 |
Statement authorised by |
Sue Skillcorn |
Pupil premium lead |
Sue Skillcorn |
Governor |
John Taylor |
Funding Overview
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£163,430
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
£17,334 |
Matched funding from school budget |
£17,334 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£198,098 |
Part A: Pupil Premium Strategy Plan
Statement of intent
All members of staff and the governing body accept responsibility for ‘socially disadvantaged’ pupils and are committed to meeting their pastoral, social and academic needs within a caring and nurturing environment. We hope that each child will develop a love for learning and acquire skills and abilities commensurate with fulfilling their potential throughout their education and as an adult finding employment. The current pupil premium strategy plan works towards achieving these objectives by poverty proofing the school in order to offer educational opportunities and life experiences to enable children to reach or exceed age related expectation. The key principal of Mill Lane Primary School’s Strategy Plan is to reduce barriers to enable every child to reach his or her full potential. Our Philosophy and Principles We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that · Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils · Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed · we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged · We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals · We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged · Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals. · Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child · Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics · No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities · Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils |
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1 |
Social: Low aspiration, poor nutrition/hunger, family aspiration/expectation, poor health, family engagement, cultural capital |
2 |
Emotional: Emotional health and well-being, low self-esteem, resilience, confidence |
3 |
Behavioural: Behaviour for learning, attendance
|
4 |
Cognitive: Communication, language and literacy, EAL, vocabulary range, progress in core curriculum, academic achievement, early intervention, Special Educational Needs. Low starting points |
5 |
NHS waiting lists are long for specialists such as the Speech and language Therapists and Occupational Therapists. |
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED THROUGH:
- Learning walks
- Pupil Premium student shadowing
- Pupil Premium student voice
- Achievement analysis
- Attendance and punctuality analysis
- Attendance at curriculum enrichment
activities
- Incident report analysis
- Attendance at parent/carer consultations
- Children, parent, SLT, staff and governor
views
- Observational assessments
- Work scrutinies
- Poverty Proofing Report
- Debating Society
- IDACI
IMPACT/MEASUREMENT
Social
- Pupil voice
- Data taking up breakfast offer
- Attendance at parent consultations
- Attendance at engagement opportunities including annual visit
- Participation data
Emotional
- Pupil voice
- Progress and attainment data
- Parent/Carer voice
- Staff voice
Behavioural
- Progress and attainment data
- Attendance data
Cognitive
- Progress and attainment data
School Profile |
196 plus 28 in nursery and 6 in 2-year-old provision |
Community Served |
47% Pupil Premium 51% boys, 49% girls 63% EAL 35% SEND, 2 HNF, 13 EHCPs We are currently gathering evidence for 18 more HNF or EHCPs |
LACYP |
4 children in our Care |
Family Demographics |
88% (almost 9 out of 10) in lowest 15%, and 7 out of 10 are in lowest 5% of deprivation in the country. This has increased by 27% in the last 5 years. 3 CP, 2 EH, 3 CIN, 4 CIOC 5 Families access counselling |
Attendance 2022/23
|
93.6% including Extended Leave & Religious Observance National Average was 92.6% |
Ethnicity/EAL |
63% EAL 34 ethnic groupings 34 languages spoken 18% (Almost 1 in 5) Significant number of refugees, asylum seekers, or Indefinite Leave to Remain |
Attainment on Entry |
Majority enter nursery at least a year behind development milestones in 10 / 17 areas. 0% in writing (W), 5% in number (N), and 12% in Reading (R) enter nursery at age related expectation (ARE) of 30-50 months (m). 33% in W, 63% in N, 63% in SSM and 41% in R enter nursery significantly below ARE (16-26m and below). No children enter above ARE (40-60 m) |
Stability |
High mobility: 47 transfers in 2022-23 therefore progress data is not always comparing the same children. Many children start Mill Lane having just arrived in the country and speaking no English, make outstanding progress, but leave when they receive Leave to Remain. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Academic achievement
|
Improved outcomes and the gap to National Others will be further closed. |
Improved attendance |
Persistent absence will improve to close the gap to with national average. |
Participation |
A poverty proofed school with enthusiastic children who are motivated to learn. |
Improved resilience, emotional health and well-being |
Happy and emotionally healthy children who are resilient and successful. |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews
8th November 2023
7th February 2023
5th June 2023
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £13,842
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Identified CPD to ensure quality first teaching and intervention
|
Assessment and identification for provision mapping leading to improved outcomes
Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees
|
4
£1,447 £3,000 |
Termly RWI Consultant support to ensure that phonics teaching is high quality and effective |
RWI outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation |
4 £3,360 |
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5 £7,680 ÷ 47% = £3,610 |
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5 £5,160 ÷ 47% = £2,425
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £136,732
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
The employment of an additional teacher employed to deliver interventions to KS2 (HL)
|
Improved KS2 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £32,116 ÷ 156 (52wksx3days) = £205.87 x 52 weeks = £10,705 |
The employment of an additional teacher employed to deliver intervention (RC)
|
Improved KS1 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £73,492 ÷ 47% = £34,541 |
The employment of an additional TA 0.5 in EY to enable children to be taught in small groups (LK)
|
Improved EY data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
Yearly Years Toolkit
|
4 £23,733 ÷ 2 = £11,866 ÷ 47% = £5,577 |
The employment of an additional TA in KS2 to enable interventions and support (SJ)
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £23,733 (CW, CR, AC) |
The employment of 0.5 TA (AA) to deliver the Early Talk Boost Language programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £24,865 ÷ 2 = £12,433 |
Mid-day supervisors’ overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4 £19,000 ÷ 47% = £8,930 |
Teacher 0.6 to deliver precision teaching (CB) |
Data, discussions and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse |
4 £47,215 ÷ 2 = £28,329
|
TA support for EAL pupils (MA / JW)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4
£14.98 an hour x 36 wks = £539 x 4 chn = £2,156 |
TA provision of Occupational Therapy to support physical development and learning (LB / NG) |
Data, discussion, OT reports and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
1
£14.98 an hour x 2.5 hrs a week x 36 wks = £1,348 x 2 TAs = £2,696
|
Reading Plus reading intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £24 x 150 chn = £3,600 |
PiXL assessment, therapy and intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £2,700 |
Lexia reading support programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4 £1,230 |
Times Tables Rock Stars |
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
£102
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £47,524
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Incentives to improve attendance
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3 £500 |
PSA to address attendance and punctuality issues
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3 £2,619 |
PSA critical attendance focus 4 mornings a week |
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3 £4,619 |
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access curriculum enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities to develop Cultural Capital |
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
£7281 |
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits, water bottles and Book bags
|
Equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
£9,520 |
Chess, Music and ICT specialist teaching
|
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
4 £7,201 |
Parent Support Advisor to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding and Emotional well-being |
Data, meetings and discussions
DfE |
4 £4,619 |
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
|
Observation and discussion
DfE |
2 £5,379 |
Provide milk and butter for the daily free breakfast for children and to provide free fruit for KS2 children
|
Health and discussions
British Nutrition Foundation |
1
£1,692 |
Staff to deliver breakfast club (GV & TAs)
|
Health and discussion
British Nutrition Foundation |
1 £4,094
|
Total budgeted cost: £198,098
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
Service pupil premium is additional funding for schools with pupils who have parents serving in the armed forces. It has been combined into pupil premium payments to make it easier for schools to manage their spending. Pupils in state-funded schools in England attract the service pupil premium grant, at the rate of £335 per eligible pupil in financial year 2023-24.
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2022 to 2023 academic year.
Attendance of PP children for 2020-21 was +0.6 above the 2018-19 national average. Attendance of PP children for 2021-22 was -0.7 below the 2018-19 national average. Attendance for PP children for 2022-23 was +0.7 above the national average. Persistent Absence of PP children for 2020-21 was -0.3 below the 2018-19 national average. Persistent Absence of PP children for 2021-22 was -3.2 below the 2018-19 national average. Persistent Absence of PP children for 2022-23 was +1.5% above the national average.
Children were identified early and were seen by the Speech and Language Therapist, Occupational Therapist and Educational Psychologist because we pay for this provision. This has been invaluable as NHS waiting times have hugely increased recently. Interventions were put into place quickly and monitored for effectiveness. |
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
Programme |
Provider |
PiXL |
PiXL |
Reading Plus |
Reading Solutions |
Lexia |
Lexia Learning |
Times Tables Rock Starts |
Maths Circle Limited |
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
Measure |
Details |
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? |
N/A |
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? |
N/A |
Pupil premium strategy statement for Mill Lane Primary School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2022 to 2023 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail | Data |
School name | Mill Lane Primary School |
Number of pupils in school | 224 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 54.91% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2022-2023 |
Date this statement was published | 01 September 2022 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | 31 August 2023 |
Statement authorised by | Sue Skillcorn |
Pupil premium lead | Sue Skillcorn |
Governor | John Taylor |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£174,510
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £18,270 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£192,780 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
All members of staff and the governing body accept responsibility for ‘socially disadvantaged’ pupils and are committed to meeting their pastoral, social and academic needs within a caring and nurturing environment. We hope that each child will develop a love for learning and acquire skills and abilities commensurate with fulfilling their potential throughout their education and as an adult finding employment. The current pupil premium strategy plan works towards achieving these objectives by poverty proofing the school in order to offer educational opportunities and life experiences to enable children to reach or exceed age related expectation. The key principal of Mill Lane Primary School’s Strategy Plan is to reduce barriers to enable every child to reach his or her full potential. Our Philosophy and Principles We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that · Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils · Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed · we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged · We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals · We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged · Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals. · Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child · Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics · No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities · Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils |
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED THROUGH:
- Learning walks
- Pupil Premium student shadowing
- Pupil Premium student voice
- Achievement analysis
- Attendance and punctuality analysis
- Attendance at curriculum enrichment
activities
- Incident report analysis
- Attendance at parent/carer consultations
- Children, parent, SLT, staff and governor
views
- Observational assessments
- Work scrutinies
- Poverty Proofing Report
- Debating Society
- IDACI
School Profile |
207 plus 21 in nursery plus 3 place Additionally Resourced Provision (ARP) for Speech, Language & Communication |
Community Served |
51% Pupil Premium 51% boys, 49% girls 65% EAL 40% SEND, 3 HNF, 13 EHCPs and 2 are currently going through the assessment process for either HNF or EHCPs |
LACYP | 3 LAC/CIOC |
Family Demographics |
88% (almost 9 out of 10) in lowest 15%, and 7 out of 10 are in lowest 5% of deprivation in the country. This has increased by 27% in the last 5 years. 7 CP, 8 EH, 11 CIN 5 Families access counselling 73% Multiple vulnerabilities 94% 1 National vulnerability |
Attendance 2019/20
2021-22 |
95.8% including Extended Leave & Religious Observance
94.1% including Extended Leave & Religious Observance |
Disadvantaged Pupil Performance overview for last academic year
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
Academic achievement
|
Improved outcomes and the gap to National Others will be further closed. |
Improved attendance | Persistent absence will improve to close the gap to with national average. |
Participation | A poverty proofed school with enthusiastic children who are motivated to learn. |
Improved resilience, emotional health and well-being | Happy and emotionally healthy children who are resilient and successful. |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews
9th November 2022
8th February 2023
14th June 2023
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £14,227
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Identified CPD to ensure quality first teaching and intervention (RAW & PRST)
|
Assessment and identification for provision mapping leading to improved outcomes
Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees
|
4
|
Termly RWI Consultant support to ensure that phonics teaching is high quality and effective |
RWI outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation |
4
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5
|
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £126,598
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
The employment of an additional teacher employed to deliver interventions to KS2 (HL)
|
Improved KS2 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of an additional 0.5 teacher employed to deliver intervention in KS1 (RC)
|
Improved KS1 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of an additional TA 0.5 in EY to enable children to be taught in small groups (LK)
|
Improved EY data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
Yearly Years Toolkit
|
4
|
The employment of an additional TA in KS2 to enable interventions (LS)
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of 0.5 TA (AA) to deliver the Early Talk Boost Language programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Mid-day supervisors overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4
|
Teacher 0.5 to deliver precision teaching (MY/ACo) |
Data, discussions and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse |
4
|
TA support for EAL pupils (MA / JW)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4
|
TA provision of Occupational Therapy to support physical development and learning (LB / NG) |
Data, discussion, OT reports and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
1
|
Reading Plus reading intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
PiXL assessment, therapy and intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Lexia reading support programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Times Tables Rock Stars |
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £51,663
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Incentives to improve attendance
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
PSA to address attendance and punctuality issues
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
PSA critical attendance focus 4 mornings a week |
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access curriculum enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities to develop Cultural Capital |
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
|
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits, water bottles and Book bags
|
Equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
|
Chess, Music and ICT specialist teaching
|
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
4
|
Parent Support Advisor to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding and Emotional well-being |
Data, meetings and discussions
DfE |
4
|
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
|
Observation and discussion
DfE |
2
|
Provide milk and butter for the daily free breakfast for children and to provide free fruit for KS2 children
|
Health and discussions
British Nutrition Foundation |
1
|
Staff to deliver breakfast club (GV & TAs)
|
Health and discussion
British Nutrition Foundation |
1
|
Total budgeted cost: £192,848
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
The Pupil Premium Grant per pupil for 2022 to 2023 is as follows:
Disadvantaged pupils | Pupil premium per pupil | |||
Pupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 free school meals | £1,385 | |||
Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority | £2,400 | |||
Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order
The Early Years Pupil Premium (EYPP) gives providers additional funding to support disadvantaged three and four year old pupils |
£2,400
£342 |
Service children | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 11 recorded as Ever 6 service child or in receipt of a child pension from the Ministry of Defence | £310 |
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2021 to 2022 academic year.
As families have been unable to travel to visit relatives (65% EAL) in recent years because of the pandemic, there have been more families taking holidays in 2021-22. Therefore: Attendance of PP children for 2020-21 was +0.6 above the 2018-19 national average. Attendance of PP children for 2021-22 was -0.7 below the 2018-19 national average. Persistent Absence of PP children for 2020-21 was -0.3 below the 2018-19 national average. Persistent Absence of PP children for 2021-22 was -3.2 below the 2018-19 national average. Children were identified early and were seen by the Speech and Language Therapist, Occupational Therapist and Educational Psychologist because we pay for this provision. This has been invaluable as NHS waiting times have hugely increased recently. Interventions were put into place quickly and monitored for effectiveness. |
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
Programme | Provider |
PiXL | PiXL |
Reading Plus | Reading Solutions |
Lexia | Lexia Learning |
Times Tables Rock Starts | Maths Circle Limited |
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
Measure | Details |
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? | N/A |
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? | N/A |
Pupil premium strategy statement for Mill Lane Primary School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2021 to 2022 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail | Data |
School name | Mill Lane Primary School |
Number of pupils in school | 214 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 54.21% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2021-2022 |
Date this statement was published | 01 September 2021 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | 31 August 2022 |
Statement authorised by | Sue Skillcorn |
Pupil premium lead | Sue Skillcorn |
Governor | John Taylor |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£149,295
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £16,095 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£165,390 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
All members of staff and the governing body accept responsibility for ‘socially disadvantaged’ pupils and are committed to meeting their pastoral, social and academic needs within a caring and nurturing environment. We hope that each child will develop a love for learning and acquire skills and abilities commensurate with fulfilling their potential throughout their education and as an adult finding employment. The current pupil premium strategy plan works towards achieving these objectives by poverty proofing the school in order to offer educational opportunities and life experiences to enable children to reach or exceed age related expectation. The key principal of Mill Lane Primary School’s Strategy Plan is to reduce barriers to enable every child to reach his or her full potential. Our Philosophy and Principles We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that · Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils · Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed · we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged · We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals · We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged · Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals. · Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child · Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics · No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities · Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils |
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED THROUGH:
- Learning walks
- Pupil Premium student shadowing
- Pupil Premium student voice
- Achievement analysis
- Attendance and punctuality analysis
- Attendance at curriculum enrichment
activities
- Incident report analysis
- Attendance at parent/carer consultations
- Children, parent, SLT, staff and governor
views
- Observational assessments
- Work scrutinies
- Poverty Proofing Report
- Debating Society
- IDACI
School Profile |
188 plus 30 in nursery 12 place Additionally Resourced Provision (ARP) for Speech, Language & Communication |
Attendance 2019/20
|
95.8% including High 11.2% Extended Leave & Religious Observance
|
Community Served |
54% Pupil Premium 52% boys, 48% girls 61% EAL 36% SEND, 5 HNF, 6 EHCPs and 10 currently going through the assessment process |
Ethnicity/EAL |
61% EAL 57% from 19 ethnic groupings 20 languages spoken 18% (Almost 1 in 5) Significant number of refugees, asylum seekers, or Infinite Leave to Remain |
LACYP | 4 LAC/CIOC | Stability | Highly mobile (102 transfers in 2019/20 and 85 in 2020-21) therefore, some of these children not showing in progress data |
Family Demographics |
88% (almost 9 out of 10) in lowest 15%, and 7 out of 10 are in lowest 5% of deprivation in the country. This has increased by 27% in the last 4 years. 3 CP, 13 EH, 14 CIN 6 Families access counselling 73% Multiple vulnerabilities 94% 1 National vulnerability |
Attainment on Entry |
Majority enter nursery at least a year behind development milestones in 10 / 17 areas. 0% in writing (W), 5% in number (N), 5% in Shape Space & Measure (SSM) and 12% in Reading (R) enter nursery at age related expectation (ARE) of 30-50 months (m). 33% in W, 63% in N, 63% in SSM and 41% in R enter nursery significantly below ARE (16-26m and below). No children enter above ARE (40-60 m) |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
Academic achievement
|
Improved outcomes and the gap to National Others will be further closed. |
Improved attendance | Persistent absence will improve to close the gap to with national average. |
Participation | A poverty proofed school with enthusiastic children who are motivated to learn. |
Improved resilience, emotional health and well-being | Happy and emotionally healthy children who are resilient and successful. |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews 20th September 2021
19th January 2022
11th May 2022
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £14,545
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Identified CPD to ensure quality first teaching and intervention (RAW)
|
Assessment and identification for provision mapping leading to improved outcomes
Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees
|
4
|
Termly RWI Consultant support to ensure that phonics teaching is high quality and effective |
RWI outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation |
4
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5
|
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services
|
Barrier to learning
Education Endowment Foundation |
5
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £101,531
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
The employment of an additional teacher employed to deliver interventions to KS2 (AC Half term) and Y5 Wed
|
Improved KS2 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of an additional 0.8 teacher employed to deliver intervention in KS1 (JS)
|
Improved KS1 data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of an additional 0.8 teacher employed to deliver catch-up curriculum (JS)
|
Improved data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of an additional teacher 0.6 in EY & Nurture group to enable children to be taught in small groups (JSp half term)
|
Improved EY data outcomes
Education Endowment Foundation
Yearly Years Toolkit
|
4
|
The employment of an additional TA in EY/KS1 to enable gap interventions (JB/ZH 60% & HNF)
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
The employment of 0.5 TA to deliver the NUFI Language catch-up programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Mid-day supervisor overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4
|
TA support for EAL pupils (MA & JW)
|
Data, discussion and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
4
|
TA provision of Occupational Therapy to support physical development and learning (LB & NG) |
Data, discussion, OT reports and observation
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
1
|
Reading Plus reading intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
PiXL assessment, therapy and intervention programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Lexia reading support programme
|
Data, discussion and observation
Education Endowment Foundation
|
4
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £49,314
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Incentives to improve attendance
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
Office staff to address attendance and punctuality issues
|
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
PSA critical attendance focus 4 mornings a week |
Attendance data
What Works Well Clearinghouse
|
3
|
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access curriculum enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities to develop Cultural Capital |
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
|
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits, water bottles and Book bags
|
Equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
2
|
Chess, Music and ICT specialist teaching
|
Participation and equality
Poverty Proofing North East |
4
|
Parent Support Advisor to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding and Emotional well-being |
Data, meetings and discussions
DfE |
4
|
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
|
Observation and discussion
DfE |
2
|
Provide milk and butter for the daily free breakfast for children and to provide free fruit for KS2 children
|
Health and discussions
British Nutrition Foundation |
1
|
Staff to deliver breakfast club (GV & TAs)
|
Health and discussion
British Nutrition Foundation |
1
|
TA support for EAL pupils (JS)
|
Health and discussions
National Development for Language Development in the Curriculum |
4
|
Total budgeted cost: £165,390
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
The Pupil Premium Grant per pupil for 2021 to 2022 is as follows:
Disadvantaged pupils | Pupil premium per pupil | |||
Pupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 free school meals | £1,320 | |||
Pupils in years 7 to 11 recorded as Ever 6 FSM | £935 | |||
Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority | £2,300 | |||
Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order |
£2,300
£300 |
Service children | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 11 recorded as Ever 6 service child or in receipt of a child pension from the Ministry of Defence | £300 |
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2020 to 2021 academic year.
Despite Covid restrictions, the intended outcomes of the 2020-21 plan were largely met. Lockdown affected the planned catch-up program in school; however, live learning and interventions continued online. In addition, 17 pupils have now received 15 tutoring sessions (either 1 to 1 or 1 to 3) as part of the National Tutoring Program. Children were identified early and were seen by the Speech and Language Therapist and Educational Psychologist online because we pay for this provision. This has been invaluable as NHS waiting times have hugely increased because of Covid restrictions. Attendance of PP children for the Autumn and Spring terms (minus Covid related absence) was 95.4%, in comparison to 95.6% for the Autumn and Spring terms 2019-20. Persistent absence in the same period for PP children was 14.8% in comparison to 17.5% for the same period 2019-20. |
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
Programme | Provider |
PiXL | PiXL |
Reading Plus | Reading Solutions |
Lexia | Lexia Learning |
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
Measure | Details |
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? | N/A |
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? | N/A |
Impact
2021-22 Spending
The Pupil Premium funding allocation was spent according to plan. There were no variations. Extra costs were covered by the school budget.
Early Years GLD
59% of Reception pupils are disadvantaged – pupils (10 boys and 6 girls). 56% of disadvantaged pupils are SEN (6 boys and 3 girls). 58% are EAL.
Year 1 Phonics
Despite the pandemic, the impact of our efforts to improve literacy skills is evident in the Y1 phonics results. Disadvantaged children outperformed non disadvantaged pupils. 67% of pupils are disadvantaged – 19 pupils. 43% are SEN. 77% are EAL.
Key Stage 1
54% of pupils are Disadvantaged – 14 pupils (9 boys and 5 girls). 77% are EAL. There is an extremely large number of SEN (54%) in this particular year group including.
Key Stage 2
By the end of primary school the impact of pupil premium spending in Mill Lane is evident in the attainment and progress of pupil premium children.
48% of pupils are Disadvantaged – 12 boys and 3 girls (a third of disadvantaged boys are SEN). 67% are EAL.
Pupil Premium Allocation 2020-2021
This data is in comparison to The School Data Company (TSDC) Average as there are no National Average figures for 2021. The School Data Company is the company Mill Lane use and it has over 200 schools. The schools are in many different socio-economic areas and their average is usually within 1% or 2% of the national average.
KS1 Pupil Premium Data |
2018 |
2019 |
2021 |
Difference 2019 to 2021 |
|
Reading |
School PP |
36% |
56% |
42% |
-14% |
TSDC PP Average |
63% |
65% |
50% |
-15% |
|
Difference |
-27% |
-9% |
-8% |
+1% |
|
Writing |
School PP |
29% |
56% |
37% |
19 |
TSDC PP Average |
58% |
60% |
41% |
19 |
|
Difference |
-29% |
-4% |
-4% |
= |
|
Maths |
School PP |
36% |
56% |
47% |
-9% |
TSDC PP Average |
65% |
67% |
51% |
-16% |
|
Difference |
-29% |
-11% |
-4% |
+7% |
Data shows that year on year Pupil Premium children are closing the gap in comparison to PP children in TSDC schools. (bold rows)
Due to Covid restrictions attainment data across the country has fallen. The data in the final column shows that attainment at Mill Lane has dropped by the same percentage or less than other TSDC schools.
This is due to the impact of KS1 interventions and how the Pupil Premium Funding is spent by the school.
KS1 Whole School Data |
2018 |
2019 |
2021 |
Difference 2019 to 2021 |
|
Reading |
School |
40% |
58% |
48% |
-10% |
TSDC Average |
76% |
76% |
66% |
-10% |
|
Difference |
-26% |
-18% |
-18% |
= |
|
Writing |
School |
40% |
55% |
44% |
-11% |
TSDC Average |
72% |
71% |
56% |
-15% |
|
Difference |
-32% |
-16% |
-12% |
+4% |
|
Maths |
School |
43% |
55% |
48% |
-7% |
TSDC Average |
77% |
77% |
66% |
-11% |
|
Difference |
-34% |
-22% |
-18% |
+4% |
The table above shows data for all children (pupil premium and non-pupil premium together) for comparison.
KS2 Pupil Premium Data |
2018 |
2019 |
2021 |
Difference 2019 to 2021 |
|
SPAG (Spelling, punctuation and grammar) |
School PP |
56% |
65% |
68% |
+3% |
TSDC PP Average |
70% |
72% |
62% |
-10% |
|
Difference |
-14% |
-7% |
+6% |
+13% |
|
Reading |
School PP |
50% |
50% |
53% |
+3% |
TSDC PP Average |
69% |
68% |
64% |
-4% |
|
Difference |
-19% |
-18% |
-11% |
+7% |
|
Maths |
School PP |
56% |
60% |
47% |
-13% |
TSDC PP Average |
70% |
75% |
61% |
-14% |
|
Difference |
-14% |
-15% |
-14% |
+1% |
|
Writing |
School PP |
56% |
60% |
42% |
-18% |
TSDC PP Average |
74% |
75% |
58% |
-17% |
|
Difference |
-18% |
-15% |
-16% |
-1% |
Data shows that year on year Pupil Premium children are closing the gap in comparison to PP children in TSDC schools except for Writing, where the gap has widened but only by 1%. (bold rows)
Due to Covid restrictions, attainment data in 2021 across the country has fallen in comparison to 2019 data. The data in the final column shows that attainment for Pupil Premium children at Mill Lane has fallen less than other TSDC schools.
This is due to the impact of KS2 interventions and how the Pupil Premium Funding is spent by the school.
KS2 Whole School Data |
2018 |
2019 |
2021 |
Difference 2019 to 2021 |
|
SPAG (Spelling, punctuation and grammar) |
School |
55% |
68% |
70% |
+2% |
TSDC Average |
80% |
80% |
72% |
-8% |
|
Difference |
-25% |
-12% |
-2% |
+10% |
|
Reading |
School |
52% |
57% |
56% |
-1% |
TSDC Average |
78% |
77% |
75% |
-2% |
|
Difference |
-26% |
-20% |
-19% |
+1% |
|
Maths |
School |
59% |
64% |
48% |
-16% |
TSDC Average |
79% |
83% |
72% |
-11% |
|
Difference |
-20% |
-19% |
-24% |
-5% |
|
Writing |
School |
55% |
61% |
41% |
-20% |
TSDC Average |
82% |
83% |
67% |
-16% |
|
Difference |
-27% |
-22% |
-26% |
+4% |
The table above shows data for all children (pupil premium and non-pupil premium together) for comparison. It shows that by the end of KS2, there is very little difference between the attainment of Pupil Premium children and the attainment of all children. This again demonstrates that Pupil Premium funding is being well spent and Mill Lane are achieving good value for money.
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
The Pupil Premium Grant per pupil for 2020 to 2021 is as follows:
Disadvantaged pupils | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 free school meals | £1,320 |
Pupils in years 7 to 11 recorded as Ever 6 FSM | £935 |
Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority | £2,300 |
Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order | £2,300 |
The Early Years Pupil Premium (EYPP) gives providers additional funding to support disadvantaged three and four year old pupils | £300 |
Service children | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 11 recorded as Ever 6 service child or in receipt of a child pension from the Ministry of Defence | £300 |
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Our Philosophy and Principles
We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that
- Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils
- Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed
- we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged
- We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals
- We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged
- Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals.
- Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child
- Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics
- No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities
- Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils
Pupil Premium Grant Allocation
2020-21 115 pupils £154,495
2019-20 118 pupils £158,060
2018-19 106 pupils £139,920
2017-18 103 pupils £135,960
2016-17 105 pupils £144,180
2015-16 108 pupils £142,560
2014-15 115 pupils £149,500
Early Years Pupil Premium Grant Allocation
2020-21 13 pupils £4,002
2019-20 9 pupils £2,844
2018-19 17 pupils £5,075
2017-18 15 pupils £4,618
2016-17 11 pupils £3,370
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews
21st September 2020
11th January 2021
10th May 2021
School Context
School Profile |
198 plus 26 PT in nursery 12 place Additionally Resourced Provision (ARP) for Speech, Language & Communication |
Attainment on Entry | Majority enter nursery at least a year behind development milestones in 10 / 17 areas |
Community Served |
53% Pupil Premium 51% boys, 49% girls 64% EAL 33% SEND, 3 EHCPs, 5 HNF |
Attendance 2018/19
2019/20 |
95.7% including High % Extended Leave & Religious Observance
95.6% (Covid-19 year) |
LACYP | 4 LAC | Ethnicity/EAL |
63% EAL 57% from 19 ethnic groupings 20 languages spoken 18% (Almost 1 in 5) Significant number of refugees, asylum seekers, or Infinite Leave to Remain |
Family Demographics |
88% (almost 9 out of 10) in lowest 15%, and 7 out of 10 are in lowest 5% of deprivation in the country. This has increased by 27% in the last 4 years. 3 CP, 8 EH, 10 CIN, 6 Families accessing counselling 37% Multiple vulnerabilities |
Stability |
Highly mobile (116 transfers 2018/19) with ‘ghost’ children not showing in data
(102 transfers 2019/20 Covid-19 year) |
AMBITION FOR DISADVANTAGED PUPILS IN OUR SCHOOL – SUCCESS CRITERIA Barriers to learning will be removed and children in Mill Lane will achieve their full potential |
|||||
BARRIERS Social · Low aspiration · Poor nutrition/hunger · Family aspiration/expectation · Family engagement · Cultural capital Emotional · Emotional health and well-being · Low self esteem · Resilience · Confidence Behavioural · Behaviour for learning · Attendance Cognitive · Communication, language and literacy · Vocabulary range · Progress in core curriculum · Academic achievement (66%) · Early intervention (59%) · Special Educational Needs (33%)
|
IMPACT/MEASUREMENT Social · Pupil voice · Data taking up breakfast offer · Attendance at parent consultations · Attendance at engagement opportunities including annual visit · Participation data Emotional · Pupil voice · Progress and attainment data · Parent/Carer voice · Staff voice Behavioural · Progress and attainment data · Attendance data Cognitive · Progress and attainment data
|
||||
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED THROUGH: · Learning walks · Pupil Premium student shadowing · Pupil Premium student voice · Achievement analysis · Attendance and punctuality analysis · Attendance at curriculum enrichment activities · Incident report analysis · Attendance at parent/carer consultations · Children, parent, SLT, staff and governor views · Observational assessments · Work scrutinies · Poverty Proofing Report · Debating Society
|
|||||
SUPPORTING RATIONAL AND RESEARCH FOR CHOSEN ACTION This action is likely to be effective because it is rooted in research: · Education Endowment Fund (EEF) * (See p8 & 9) · Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees ** · Effective Practice Case Study: St Bede’s Primary School, Stockton *** · What Works Well Clearinghouse · Early Years Toolkit |
|||||
MAIN OBJECTIVES | ACTION TO ADDRESS BARRIER | PLANNED IMPACT | MONITORING OF EFFECTIVENESS | AMOUNT ALLOCATED | |
Academic achievement and early intervention (Priority 1 of the School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2021 Improved outcomes and the gap to National Others will be further closed.
|
The employment of an additional 0.65 teacher employed to deliver catch-up curriculum to KS2 (AC – catch-up funding)
The employment of an additional 0.45 teacher employed to deliver catch-up curriculum in KS1 (JS)
The employment of an additional teacher 0.6 in Nurture group to enable children to be taught in small groups (SL)
The allocation of an additional apprentice TA in EY to enable interventions* TY
The employment of an additional TA in EY to enable catch-up interventions JB
The employment of an additional TA in KS1 to enable interventions (SB)
The allocation of 1.6 highly trained TAs to develop and deliver high quality early intervention and support * (-HNF) JH JB
Additional TAs for precision teaching in nurture group (CA, LB, NG, minus paid for by 3 HNF)
Reading Plus reading intervention programme
Mid-day supervisor overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained), and voluntary Right to Read Programme with Johnson Matthey, Youth for Christ and volunteer readers.
PiXL assessment, therapy and intervention programme
Lexia reading support programme
Release of SLT to monitor standards, challenge and support across school
Identified CPD to ensure quality first teaching and intervention (Raising Achievement in Writing) |
All pupils have a balanced curriculum and specific interventions delivered by expert practitioners which will lead to accelerated progress to reach age related expectations after Covid-19
All children to have access to Quality First Teaching raise attainment and rates of progress
Children to have access to support to plug gaps in learning and to pre-teach to enable children to access age appropriate curriculum
Improved outcomes
Improved reading outcomes Promote a love of reading at home
Improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved assessment and identification for provision mapping leading to improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved outcomes |
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved KS1 outcomes
Improved EY GLD outcomes
Improved outcomes, Increased vocabulary. Improved listening skills language and understanding.
Outcome data
Children’s confidence in and enjoyment of reading increases. Children make good progress in reading.
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data |
£1,390
£13499
=£14,889
£11,448
£748
(EY £4,002)
£3255
£9,805
£8,845 £8550
£14,415
£1,073
£6,201
= £64,340 + £14,889 £79,229 £1,717
£444
£4027
£715
= £ 6,903 £79,229 £86,132 |
|
Special Educational Needs (Priority 1 of the School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2020 Reduce waiting times for specialist support Regular monitoring of progress
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist *
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services |
Children’s speech and language development is supported and any barriers are addressed which will impact on their wider attainment, self-esteem and self-confidence
Children have access to specialist assessment and support |
Early identification of children with Special Educational Needs who require specialist support Regular monitoring of progress – improved literacy outcomes
Increase staff expertise in supporting children with SEN
|
£11,200
£5,500
= £16,700 £86,132 £102,832 |
|
Attendance – with specific focus on Persistent absence (Priority 2 of School Development Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2021 Persistent absence will improve to be in line with national average
|
Incentives to improve attendance 100% weekly attendance treats 100% term attendance vouchers 100% year attendance trip Weekly Fredo Frogs
Office staff to address attendance and punctuality issues
PSA critical attendance focus 4 mornings a week |
Increased attendance of all groups which will impact on attainment and progress
Improved attendance and punctuation |
Weekly monitoring or particular children – Attendance and data
Attendance and punctuality data |
£2,000
£2619
£4619
= £9,238 £102,832 £112,070 |
|
Participation (Priority 3 of School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2021 100% PP participation in visits
|
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access curriculum enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities to develop Cultural Capital
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits, water bottles and Book bags
Chess, Music and ICT specialist teaching
|
Children can access visits to support their learning across the curriculum which will enhance children’s learning experiences which will enhance their knowledge and understanding of the curriculum
Children develop a range of life skills and experiences and develop a love of learning
To ensure that poverty proofing enables all children to participate fully in education and do not feel discriminated against |
Children have opportunities to participate in a wide range of events and visits.
Children wear school uniform with pride. Through all aspects of school, children consistently display good attitudes to learning, respect for school and the core values – children’s questionnaires |
£9,920
£9,520
£7201
= £26,641 £112,070 £138,711 |
|
Resilience, emotional health and well-being (Priority 3 School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2021 Parents can access support from other agencies
|
Parent Support Advisor(PSA), Julie Cole, to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding (Child Protection and Early Help) and Emotional well being 4 afternoons a week
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
Provide milk and butter for the daily free breakfast for children and to provide free fruit for KS2 children
Staff to deliver breakfast club (GV & TAs) |
Stability of key children, enabling them to attend, be ready to learn and be emotionally supported. Families have access to an identified adult who can advise them and help them access support from other agencies.
Children have access to emotional support and counselling
Children will not be hungry and therefore will be able to concentrate for longer periods of time |
Early identification of families who require additional support through Early Help – attendance data
Children’s emotional presentation improves so that they are ready for learning. Observation, discussions with staff and children.
|
£4,619
£5,379
£1692
£4094
= £15,784 + £138,711 £154,495 |
|
EEF Research
Evidence Statement | Evidence Strength | Actions Implemented | Date | By Whom | Impact |
Develop pupils’ language capability to support their reading and writing | Extensive |
· DfE Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) · Additional EAL intervention to develop vocabulary · Speech & Language provision · Continue Talking to Learn
|
Autumn 2
Autumn 1
|
EY Team
TA |
|
Use a balanced and engaging approach to developing fluent reading, which integrates both decoding and comprehension skills | Extensive |
· RWI books used into KS1 · New replacement reading scheme books ordered · ORT books used to promote enjoyment of reading at home · Booster Reading Programme : A system is now in place across school so that all classes receive 1:1 reading support from trained adults throughout the week · Reading Plus continues · Lexia continues |
Autumn 1 |
English Lead
HT (Right 2 Read, Youth 4 Christ), MDS. |
|
Effectively implement a systematic phonics programme | Very Extensive |
· RWI continues · Whole school staff re-trained to ensure that all staff understand the principles behind effective phonics teaching |
Autumn 1 | English lead | |
Teach pupils strategies for developing and monitoring their reading comprehension | Extensive |
· Reading Plus continues · Lexia continues · All teaching staff have received Reciprocal reading training. |
Autumn 1
|
HT
|
|
Teach pupils strategies for planning and monitoring their writing and compositions strategies through modelling and supported practice | Moderate |
· BIG Write continues · CPD on effective teaching of writing · Joined LA Raising Achievement in Writing (RAW) · Employed a KS2 writing specialist teacher |
Autumn 1
|
English Lead HT |
|
Promote fluent written transcription skills and sentence construction by encouraging extensive and effective practise and explicitly teaching spelling | Moderate |
· Continue RWI spelling programme · Spelling taught 3 times a week · PiXL |
Autumn 1 | English Lead | |
Accurately assess pupil needs and use high quality information about pupils current capabilities to select the best next steps for teaching and to target teaching support accurately | Extensive |
· Regular pupil progress meetings · Provision mapping · Wellbeing Champion · Wellbeing CPD · LORIC · Attachment CPD · Counselling |
On-going | HT | |
Use high-quality structured interventions to help pupils who are struggling with their literacy | Extensive |
· 1:1 RWI phonics · PiXL · Lexia · Reading Plus · Prodegy · Master Maths Hub school · Catch-up program |
On-going | TAs, Phonics lead |
Pupil Premium Allocation 2019-2020
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
The Pupil Premium Grant per pupil for 2018 to 2019 is as follows:
Disadvantaged pupils |
Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 free school meals |
£1,320 |
Pupils in years 7 to 11 recorded as Ever 6 FSM |
£935 |
Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority |
£2,300 |
Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order The Early Years Pupil Premium (EYPP) gives providers additional funding to support disadvantaged three and four year old pupils |
£2,300
£300 |
Service children |
Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 11 recorded as Ever 6 service child or in receipt of a child pension from the Ministry of Defence |
£300 |
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Our Philosophy and Principles
We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that
- Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils
- Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed
- we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged
- We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals
- We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged
- Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals.
- Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child
- Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics
- No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities
- Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils
Pupil Premium Grant Allocation | 2019-20 | 118 pupils | £158,060 |
2018-19 | 106 pupils | £139,920 | |
2017-18 | 103 pupils | £135,960 | |
2016-17 | 105 pupils | £144,180 | |
2015-16 | 108 pupils | £142,560 | |
2014-15 | 115 pupils | £149,500 |
Early Years Pupil Premium Grant Allocation | 2018-19 | 8 pupils | £2,500 |
2017-18 | 8 pupils | £2,500 | |
2016-17 |
24 pupils | £7,200 |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews:-
11th October 2019
10th February 2020
8th June 2020
School Context
School Profile |
203 plus 49 PT in nursery 17 place Additionally Resourced Provision (ARP) for Speech, Language & Communication |
Attainment on Entry |
Majority enter nursery at least a year behind development milestones in most areas 10 / 17 |
Community Served |
41.8% Pupil Premium 52% boys, 48% girls 63% EAL 28% SEND, 5 EHCPs |
Attendance 2018/19 |
95.7% including High % Extended Leave & Religious Observance |
LACYP |
1 LAC |
Ethnicity/EAL |
63% EAL 60% from 10 ethnic groupings 28 languages spoken 18% (Almost 1 in 5) Significant number of refugees, asylum seekers, or Infinite Leave to Remain |
Family Demographics |
88% (almost 9 out of 10) in lowest 20%, and 20% (1 in 5) in lowest 5% deprivation in country 5 CP, 6 EH, 5 CIN 6 Families accessing counselling 37% Multiple vulnerabilities |
Stability |
Highly mobile (116 transfers 2018/19) with ‘ghost’ children not showing in data |
AMBITION FOR DISADVANTAGED PUPILS IN OUR SCHOOL – SUCCESS CRITERIA · Barriers to learning will be removed and children in Mill Lane will achieve their full potential
|
|||||
BARRIERS Social · Low aspiration · Poor nutrition/hunger · Family aspiration/expectation · Family engagement · Cultural capital Emotional · Emotional health and well-being · Low self esteem · Resilience · Confidence Behavioural · Behaviour for learning · Attendance Cognitive · Communication, language and literacy · Vocabulary range · Progress in core curriculum · Academic achievement (66%) · Early intervention (59%) · Special Educational Needs (36%)
|
IMPACT/MEASUREMENT Social · Pupil voice · Data taking up breakfast offer · Attendance at parent consultations · Attendance at engagement opportunities including annual visit · Participation data Emotional · Pupil voice · Progress and attainment data · Parent/Carer voice · Staff voice Behavioural · Progress and attainment data · Attendance data Cognitive · Progress and attainment data
|
||||
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED THROUGH: · Learning walks · Pupil Premium student shadowing · Pupil Premium student voice · Achievement analysis · Attendance and punctuality analysis · Attendance at curriculum enrichment activities · Incident report analysis · Attendance at parent/carer consultations · Children, parent, SLT, staff and governor views · Observational assessments · Work scrutinies · Poverty Proofing Report · Debating Society
|
|||||
SUPPORTING RATIONAL AND RESEARCH FOR CHOSEN ACTION This action is likely to be effective because it is rooted in research: · Education Endowment Fund (EEF) * (See p8 & 9) · Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees ** · Effective Practice Case Study: St Bede’s Primary School, Stockton *** · What Works Well Clearinghouse · Early Years Toolkit |
|||||
MAIN OBJECTIVES |
ACTION TO ADDRESS BARRIER |
PLANNED IMPACT |
MONITORING OF EFFECTIVENESS |
AMOUNT ALLOCATED |
|
Academic achievement and early intervention (Priority 1 of the School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2010 Improved outcomes and the gap to National Others will be further closed.
|
The employment of an additional 0.6 teacher employed in KS2 to enable Year 6 children to be taught in smaller groups * JA
The employment of an additional 0.8 teacher in Nurture group to enable children to be taught in small groups (Spring Term)* SP
The allocation of an additional TA in EYFS Reception to enable interventions* JL
The employment of a TA in EY & KS1 to support speech, language & communication including oral language and semantics and learning interventions identified in Pupil Progress Meetings (.5 HNF) JK
The allocation of 1.6 highly trained TAs to develop and deliver high quality early intervention and support with early provision and self-care* (-HNF) JH JB
Apprentice in Y3 to support vulnerable groups with learning (TY)
*Booster Reading \programme throughout school including Mid-day supervisor overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained), and voluntary Right to Read Programme with Johnson Matthey, Youth for Christ and volunteer readers.
PiXL intervention
Membership of the EEF and Literacy Campaign *
Mid-day supervisors reading programme each afternoon 5
LA Reading Review
Release of SLT to monitor standards, challenge and support across school
Identified CPD to ensure quality first teaching and intervention |
All children to have access to Quality First Teaching raise attainment and rates of progress
Children to have access to support to plug gaps in learning and to pre-teach to enable children to access age appropriate curriculum
All pupils have a balanced curriculum and specific interventions delivered by expert practitioners which will lead to improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved reading outcomes Promote a love of reading at home
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved outcomes
Raised self-esteem and confidence
Identify strengths and weaknesses
Address weaknesses
Improved outcomes |
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved KS1 outcomes
Improved EY GLD outcomes
Improved outcomes, Increased vocabulary. Improved listening skills language and understanding.
Outcome data
Outcome data
Children’s confidence in and enjoyment of reading increases. Children make good progress in reading.
Improved reading outcomes
Improved reading outcomes
Improved outcomes
Data
|
£10,280
£12,169
= £22449
£10,230
£3,595
£11,408
£2141
£12,100
£1,680
£550
£8550
=£72,703 £209
£11,540
£4027
£15,776 + £72,703 =£88,479 |
|
Special Educational Needs (Priority 1 of the School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2020 Reduce waiting times for specialist support Regular monitoring of progress
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist *
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services |
Children’s speech and language development is supported and any barriers are addressed which will impact on their wider attainment, self-esteem and self-confidence
Children have access to specialist assessment and support |
Early identification of children with Special Educational Needs who require specialist support Regular monitoring of progress – improved literacy outcomes
Increase staff expertise in supporting children with SEN
|
£11,200
£5,500
£16,700 + £88,479 =£105,179 |
|
Attendance – with specific focus on Persistent absence (Priority 2 of School Development Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2020 Persistent absence will improve to be in line with national average
|
Incentives to improve attendance 100% weekly attendance treats 100% term attendance vouchers 100% year attendance trip Weekly Freddo Frogs
Office staff to address attendance and punctuality issues |
Increased attendance of all groups which will impact on attainment and progress
Improved attendance and punctuation |
Weekly monitoring or particular children – Attendance and data
Attendance and punctuality data |
£2,000
£2619
£4619 + £105,179 =£109,798 |
|
Participation (Priority 3 of School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2019 100% PP participation in visits
|
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access curriculum enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities to develop Cultural Capital
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits, water bottles and Book bags
Chess, Music and ICT specialist teaching
|
Children can access visits to support their learning across the curriculum which will enhance children’s learning experiences which will enhance their knowledge and understanding of the curriculum
Children develop a range of life skills and experiences and develop a love of learning
To ensure that poverty proofing enables all children to participate fully in education and do not feel discriminated against |
Children have opportunities to participate in a wide range of events and visits.
Children wear school uniform with pride. Through all aspects of school, children consistently display good attitudes to learning, respect for school and the core values – children’s questionnaires |
£9,920
£9,520
£7201
£26,641 + £109,798 £136,439 |
|
Resilience, emotional health and well-being (Priority 3 School Improvement Plan)
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 20120 Parents can access support from other agencies
|
Parent Support Advisor(PSA), Julie Cole, to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding (Child Protection and Early Help) and Emotional well being
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
1 member of staff to train to become a Wellbeing Champion
An extra mid-day supervisor to support vulnerable children at lunchtime
Provide milk and butter for the daily free breakfast for children and to provide free fruit for KS2 children
Staff to deliver breakfast club (GV & TAs) |
Stability of key children, enabling them to attend, be ready to learn and be emotionally supported. Families have access to an identified adult who can advise them and help them access support from other agencies.
Children have access to emotional support and counselling
Specialist knowledge and practice in school to support
Children’s well-being and social and emotional development supported
Children will not be hungry and therefore will be able to concentrate for longer periods of time |
Early identification of families who require additional support through Early Help – attendance data
Children’s emotional presentation improves so that they are ready for learning. Observation, discussions with staff and children.
Reduce barrier to learning
Reduce barrier to learning
|
£9,208
£5,379
£200
£1068
£1672
£4094
£21,621 + £136,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
=£158,060
|
|
EEF Research
Evidence Statement |
Evidence Strength |
Actions Implemented |
Date |
By Whom |
Impact |
Develop pupils’ speaking and listening skills and wider understanding of language |
Extensive |
· Tracks to Literacy Scheme introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Talk Boost intervention delivered by KS1 additional TA. · Additional EAL training to help develop vocabulary · Became a Talking to Learn School |
Autumn 2
Autumn 1 and ongoing Spring 1 |
SENCo
EAL Advisor |
TAs are reporting greater increase in confidence in pupils but cannot measure quantitatively at this point. |
Use a balanced and engaging approach to developing reading, which integrates both decoding and comprehension skills |
Extensive |
· RWI books introduced into KS1. · New guided reading scheme introduced so that have access to more challenging resources. · New reading scheme purchased to promote enjoyment of reading at home. · Introduction of Cracking Comprehension · Booster Reading Programme : A system is now in place across school so that all classes receive 1:1 reading support from trained adults throughout the week · Reading Plus introduced |
Spring 1 Spring 2016
Spring 1
Autumn 2 Autumn 1 |
English Lead
HT Right 2 Read, Youth 4 Christ, MDS. |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Effectively implement a systematic phonics programme |
Very Extensive |
· RWI introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Whole school staff training to ensure that all staff understand the principles behind effective phonics teaching |
Spring 1 |
English lead, KI (Phonics Lead) |
· After testing Yr 1 pupils, phonics projections at 69%; Yr 2 re-check at 50%. |
Teach pupils strategies for developing and monitoring their reading comprehension |
Extensive |
· Introduction of Cracking Comprehension across school, with training. · All staff received inference and deduction training as part of PD Day · All teaching staff have received Reciprocal reading training. |
Autumn 2
Autumn1
Autumn 1 and 2 |
HT
HT |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Teach pupils strategies for planning and monitoring their writing |
Moderate |
· Introduction of BIG Write across school · PD Day on effective marking, editing and proof reading of children’s writing |
Autumn 1
Spring 2 |
English Lead HT |
Writing predictions: Rec 59% (M) 55% (C) Y1 63%(M) 58% (C) Y2 61% (M) 52% (C) |
Promote fluent written transcription skills by encouraging extensive and effective practise and explicitly teaching spelling |
Limited |
· Year 2+ have access to the RWI spelling programme to ensure all spelling patterns are taught across school. |
Autumn 2 |
English Lead |
|
Use high quality information about pupils current capabilities to select the best next steps for teaching |
Moderate |
· Regular pupil progress meetings held after assessment week to monitor progress and discuss next steps for pupils who appear ‘stuck’ · Wellbeing Champion · 2 Attachment specialists |
On-going |
HT |
Teachers more accountable for pupil’s progress and discussions re interventions and new strategies for pupils falling behind take place. |
Use high-quality structured interventions to help pupils who are struggling with their literacy |
Extensive |
· Talk Boost, Tracks to Literacy, 1:1 RWI phonics intervention carried out on pupils identified after pupil’s progress meetings or assessments. · Introduce PiXL across KS1 and KS2 · Master Maths Hub school |
On-going |
TAs, Phonics lead |
TA feedback to T effectiveness of these programmes. This is again monitored to ensure that chn are making grounds as a result of interventions during PPMeetings. |
Pupil Premium Strategy
At Mill Lane Primary School, we have high aspirations and ambitions for your children and we believe that no child should be left behind. We strongly believe that it is not about where our children come from but their passion and thirst for knowledge, and their dedication and commitment to learning that make the difference between success and failure. We are determined to ensure that the children of Mill Lane are given every chance to realise their full potential. Our school moto is, ‘We are unique and together we create a global family. Shoot for the moon and you’ll land amongst the stars.’
Pupil Premium Strategy
At Mill Lane Primary School, we have high aspirations and ambitions for your children and we believe that no child should be left behind. We strongly believe that it is not about where our children come from but their passion and thirst for knowledge, and their dedication and commitment to learning that make the difference between success and failure. We are determined to ensure that the children of Mill Lane are given every chance to realise their full potential. Our school moto is, ‘We are unique and together we create a global family. Shoot for the moon and you’ll land amongst the stars.’
We seek to ensure that every child has the best possible start to their education, that barriers to learning are removed and that every child has the opportunity to reach their full potential. We see every child as an individual, but recognise that our school community has a diverse range of needs:
- Over 50% of our children are learning English as an additional language (EAL);
- Some of our children are new to the country and have never had any previous schooling;
- We have a highly mobile population, meaning that many children do not stay with us throughout their whole primary education;
- Many of our children with SEN have difficulties with speech, language and communication;
- The school serves an area of high social deprivation;
- Many children have multiple vulnerabilities.
56% of our pupils attract extra funding through the Pupil Premium Grant (PPG), as well as 60% who are entitled to the Early Years PPG. The government provides this additional funding to schools in order to help them to address the barriers to learning. It is for each school to decide how this money should be spent, in order to meet the specific needs of the children in the school. Due to the large percentage of pupils who attract additional funding at Mill Lane, in many cases we are focusing on enhancing provision to meet the needs of all children. In these cases, the Pupil Premium is used in proportionately.
Barriers to learning include:
- Language and vocabulary deficit
- Limited social and cultural experience, ambition and aspiration
- Mobility
- Social deprivation
- Extended leave
- Social and emotional barriers
- Poverty including ‘working poor’
- Lower than average starting points
- Health is in the lower 10% nationally for categories such as oral health
- Undervalue education
At Mill Lane, we use the PPG to address six main objectives:
- Early intervention: this approach ensures that the school is able to work with children and families to address needs as soon as possible;
- Attendance: educational achievement requires good attendance;
- Special Educational Needs: additional specialist resources;
- Academic achievement: additional teaching and resources to promote progress for all, including support for parents to promote progress for all;
- Participation: provision of resources to ensure that no child is unable to take part in any activity because of financial disadvantage;
- Resilience: a school-wide focus on developing a growth mindset, ensuring that our children learn how to overcome barriers for themselves.
The impact of spending from the PPG is regularly reviewed by the Governing Body. The dates for review this year are:
- 19th September 2017
- 16th January 2018
- 8th May 2018
Pupil Premium Allocation
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment.
In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
Category | Allocation per Eligible Pupil | |
FSM | Children entitled to free school meals | £1,320 |
Ever 6 | Children who have received fee school meals in the last 6 years | £1,320 |
CLA | Children who have been looked after continuously for at least 6 months or who are looked after for one day or more, and those who are adopted from care or leave care under a special guardianship or residence order | £1,900 |
Forces | Children with a parent in the armed services | £300 |
EYPP | Children who are 3 and 4 years old who meet the above criteria | £300 |
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Our Philosophy and Principles
We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that:-
- Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils
- Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed
- we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged
- We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals
- We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged
- Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals.
- Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child
- Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics
- No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities
- Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils
Pupil Premium Grant Allocation | 2017-18 | 103 pupils | £135,960 |
2016-17 | 105 pupils | £144,180 | |
2015-16 | 108 pupils | £142,560 | |
2014-15 | 115 pupils | £149,500 |
Early Years Pupil Premium Grant Allocation | 2017-18 | 8 pupils | £2,500 |
2016-17 | 24 pupils | £7,200 |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews | 19th September 2017 |
16th January 2018 | |
8th May 2018 |
AMBITION FOR DISADVANTAGED PUPILS IN OUR SCHOOL – SUCCESS CRITERIA Barriers to learning will be removed and children in Mill Lane will achieve their full potential · Academic achievement · Early intervention · Special Educational Needs · Attendance · Participation C = Cohort, including ARP children · Resilience, emotional health and well-being only M = Mainstream children |
||||
Supporting rationale and research for chosen action: · Education Endowment Fund * (See p8 & 9) · Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees ** · Effective Practice Case Study: St Bede’s Primary School, Stockton *** |
||||
MAIN OBJECTIVES | ACTION TO ADDRESS BARRIER | PLANNED IMPACT | MONITORING OF EFFECTIVENESS | AMOUNT ALLOCATED |
Academic achievement and early intervention
|
The employment of an additional teacher employed in KS2 to enable Year 6 children to be taught in smaller groups *
The employment of an additional 0.5 teacher (DH) in Y2 to enable children to be taught in smaller groups *
The allocation of an additional TA in year 1 to enable adults to provide more high quality 1:1 feedback and feedforward to pupils *
The allocation of an additional 0.5 teacher in Reception to enable EYFS interventions*
The employment of a TA in EY & KS1 to support speech, language & communication including oral language and semantics and learning interventions identified in Pupil Progress Meetings
The allocation of 1.5 highly trained TAs to develop and deliver high quality early intervention and support with early SALT provision and self-care *
*Booster Reading \programme throughout school including Mid-day supervisor overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained), and voluntary Right to Read Programme with Johnson Matthey, Youth for Christ and volunteer readers.
PiXL intervention
Membership of the EEF and Literacy Campaign * |
All children to have access to Quality First Teaching raise attainment and rates of progress
Children to have access to support to plug gaps in learning and to pre-teach to enable children to access age appropriate curriculum
Children to have access reading intervention and individual pupil support as required
All pupils have a balanced curriculum and specific interventions delivered by expert practitioners which will lead to improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved reading outcomes Promote a love of reading at home
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved outcomes
|
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved KS1 outcomes
Improved Y1 phonics outcomes
Improved EY GLD outcomes
Improved outcomes, Increased vocabulary. Improved listening skills language and understanding.
Improved outcomes
Children’s confidence in and enjoyment of reading increases. Children make good progress in reading. |
£10,280
£11,300
£4,880
£10,230
£13,860
£17,900
£12,100
£1,680
£550 |
Special Educational Needs
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist *
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services |
Children’s speech and language development is supported and any barriers are addressed which will impact on their wider attainment, self-esteem and self-confidence
Children have access to specialist assessment and support |
Reduce waiting times for specialist support Regular monitoring of progress
Early identification of children with Special Educational Needs who require specialist support Regular monitoring of progress Increase staff expertise in supporting children with SEN |
£11,200
£5,500 |
Attendance |
Attendance review and Incentives to improve attendance 100% weekly attendance treats 100% term attendance vouchers 100% year attendance trip |
Increased attendance of all groups which will impact on attainment and progress |
Attendance improves to in line with national average
|
£2,000 |
Participation |
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits and Book bags |
Children can access visits to support their learning across the curriculum which will enhance children’s learning experiences which will enhance their knowledge and understanding of the curriculum
Children develop a range of life skills and experiences and develop a love of learning
To ensure that poverty proofing enables all children to participate fully in education and does not feel discriminated against
|
100% participation in visits
Children have opportunities to participate in a wide range of events and visits.
Children wear school uniform with pride. Through all aspects of school, children consistently display good attitudes to learning, respect for school and the core values |
£7,960
£9,520
|
Resilience, emotional health and well-being |
Provide a Parent Support Advisor(PSA), Julie Cole, to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding (Child Protection and Early Help) and Emotional well being
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
|
Stability of key children, enabling them to attend, be ready to learn and be emotionally supported.
Families have access to an identified adult who can advise them and help them access support from other agencies.
Children have access to emotional support and counselling
|
Parents can access support from other agencies
Early identification of families who require additional support through Early Help
Children’s emotional presentation improves so that they are ready for learning. |
£12,000
£5,000
|
EEF Research
Evidence Statement | Evidence Strength | Actions Implemented | Date | By Whom | Impact |
Develop pupils’ speaking and listening skills and wider understanding of language | Extensive |
· Tracks to Literacy Scheme introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Talk Boost intervention delivered by KS1 additional TA. · Additional EAL training to help develop vocabulary |
Autumn 2
Autumn 1 and ongoing Spring 1 |
SENCo
EAL Advisor |
TAs are reporting greater increase in confidence in pupils but cannot measure quantitatively at this point. |
Use a balanced and engaging approach to developing reading, which integrates both decoding and comprehension skills | Extensive |
· RWI books introduced into KS1. · New guided reading scheme introduced so that have access to more challenging resources. · New reading scheme purchased to promote enjoyment of reading at home. · Introduction of Cracking Comprehension · Booster Reading Programme : A system is now in place across school so that all classes receive 1:1 reading support from trained adults throughout the week |
Spring 1 Spring 2016
Spring 1
Autumn 2 Autumn 1 |
English Lead
HT Right 2 Read, Youth 4 Christ, MDS. |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Effectively implement a systematic phonics programme | Very Extensive |
· RWI introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Whole school staff training to ensure that all staff understand the principles behind effective phonics teaching |
Spring 1 | English lead, KI (Phonics Lead) | · After testing Yr 1 pupils, phonics projections at 69%; Yr 2 re-check at 50%. |
Teach pupils strategies for developing and monitoring their reading comprehension | Extensive |
· Introduction of Cracking Comprehension across school, with training. · All staff received inference and deduction training as part of PD Day · All teaching staff have received Reciprocal reading training. |
Autumn 2
Autumn1
Autumn 1 and 2 |
HT
HT |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Teach pupils strategies for planning and monitoring their writing | Moderate |
· Introduction of BIG Write across school · PD Day on effective marking, editing and proof reading of children’s writing |
Autumn 1
Spring 2 |
English Lead HT |
Writing predictions: Rec 59% (M) 55% (C) Y1 63%(M) 58% (C) Y2 61% (M) 52% (C) |
Promote fluent written transcription skills by encouraging extensive and effective practise and explicitly teaching spelling | Limited | · Year 2+ have access to the RWI spelling programme to ensure all spelling patterns are taught across school. | Autumn 2 | English Lead | |
Use high quality information about pupils current capabilities to select the best next steps for teaching | Moderate | · Regular pupil progress meetings held after assessment week to monitor progress and discuss next steps for pupils who appear ‘stuck’ | On-going | HT | Teachers more accountable for pupil’s progress and discussions re interventions and new strategies for pupils falling behind take place. |
Use high-quality structured interventions to help pupils who are struggling with their literacy | Extensive | · Talk Boost, Tracks to Literacy, 1:1 RWI phonics intervention carried out on pupils identified after pupil’s progress meetings or assessments. | On-going | TAs, Phonics lead | TA feedback to T effectiveness of these programmes. This is again monitored to ensure that chn are making grounds as a result of interventions during PPMeetings. |
2017-18 Spending
The Pupil Premium funding allocation was spent according to plan. There were no variations. Extra costs were covered by the school budget.
NB When reading data please bear in mind that up to 21% in each cohort is made up of children accessing the Speech, Language and Communication provision from across the authority and this typically means a corresponding proportion unlikely to achieve at age-related standards.
‘National Other’ means non disadvantaged.
Early Years
At their first statutory assessment, there is clear evidence of low levels of development for many of our pupil premium children. Early Years pupils have been specifically targeted to reduce the barriers to learning and progress.
48% of Reception pupils are disadvantaged – 14 pupils (13 boys and 1 girl). This significant gender difference has impacted on the data as there is a large number of SEN disadvantaged boys (9) in this cohort and only 1 disadvantaged girl.
50% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the GLD. Nationally, 73% of non-disadvantaged pupils achieved the GLD. Therefore, there is an achievement gap of 23%. This has doubled from 2017 but is significantly less than the gap in 2016.
Despite the low starting points and high number of disadvantaged pupils, 50% is just below disadvantaged pupils nationally (56%).
Y1 Phonics
The impact of our efforts to improve literacy skills is evident in the Y1 phonics results.
53% of pupils are disadvantaged – 16 pupils (8 boys and 8 girls).
81.3% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the standard which is just short when compared to 84% of ‘Other’ pupils nationally. Therefore, there is an achievement gap of just 2.7% which is less than one child. This has narrowed by 11%.
National disadvantaged is 70%. The performance of disadvantaged pupils in school is 11% higher than disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has closed by 12%.
47% of pupils are Disadvantaged – 14 pupils (7 boys and 7 girls).
There is an extremely large number of SEN (43%) in this particular year group including 7 Y2 boys in the ARP which significantly impacts on data.
Reading
36% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 79% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 43%. This has widened by 17%. National disadvantaged is 54%. Disadvantaged pupils are below disadvantaged pupils nationally by 18%. This has widened by 8%.
Writing
29% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 79% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 43%. This has widened by 30%. National disadvantaged is 60%. Disadvantaged pupils are below disadvantaged pupils nationally by 25%.. This has widened by 21%.
Maths
36% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 79% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 43%. This has widened by 23%. National disadvantaged is 62%. Disadvantaged pupils are below disadvantaged pupils nationally by 26%. This has widened by 23%.
KS1 Progress
In reading the progress of pupil premium children and the progress of non-pupil premium children is exactly the same. The gap has closed by 10%.
In writing the progress on non-disadvantaged pupils is still better than disadvantaged pupils. However, the gap has closed by 2%.
In maths the progress on non-disadvantaged pupils is still better than disadvantaged pupils. The gap has widened by 16%.
By the end of primary school the impact of pupil premium spending in Mill Lane is evident in the attainment and progress of pupil premium children.
55% of pupils are Disadvantaged – 16 pupils (8 boys and 8 girls).
Reading
50% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 77% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 27%. This has narrowed by 16%. National disadvantaged is 60%. Disadvantaged pupils are 10% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 6%.
Writing
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 81% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 25%. This has narrowed by 25%. National disadvantaged is 66%. Disadvantaged pupils are 10% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has widened by 7%.
Maths
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 80% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 24%. This has narrowed by 19%. National disadvantaged is 63%. Disadvantaged pupils are 7% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 12%.
SPaG
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 82% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 26%. This has widened by 7%. National disadvantaged is 66%. Disadvantaged pupils are 10% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has widened by 7%.
RWM
38% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard compared to 81% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 43%. This has widened by 7%. National disadvantaged is 48%. Disadvantaged pupils are 10% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 7%.
KS2 Progress
In reading, pupil premium children have made more progress than non-pupil premium with a difference of 0.8. The gap has closed by 3.9.
In writing, pupil premium children have made more progress than non-pupil premium with a difference of 0.4. The gap has closed by 5.8.
In maths, pupil premium children have made more progress than non-pupil premium with a difference of 0.5. The gap has closed by 4.2.
Lessons Learned
Levels of deprivation at Mill Lane are considerably higher than nationally and the proportion of pupil premium children is considerably higher than national figures. A significant number of other children live in families who are just above the threshold (working-poor) and a significant number of other children are refugees and are not eligible for pupil premium funding but are in the lowest 5% in the country for deprivation. When planning the budget, including pupil premium spending, we work extremely hard to ensure that the maximum number of pupils benefit from pupil premium funding and that no child is discriminated against.
By the time children leave Mill Lane pupil premium children have caught up to non-pupil premium children and often overtaken them. Whilst the plan to target specific older pupils across school continues to work, the plan to put funding into targeting younger children for early intervention and rapid progress is also working and will continue next year. Removing/reducing the barriers earlier means that children are able to access the curriculum for their year group sooner and more effectively.
Although the attainment of KS1 pupil premium children is lower than last year the progress this cohort have made from their low starting points is very pleasing. They have made good progress in reading, writing and maths. The gap is closing from last year in reading and in writing. It has widened in Maths. The school is now a Mastery Hub School and there is a real focus on the teaching of mastery in Y1. PiXL maths intervention is being used in year 2 and pupil premium pays for an additional TA for this to take place.
In KS2 the gaps are narrowing against national average and national other. PiXL is being introduced across KS2 and pupil premium funding is used to employ additional staff to enable this to take place. Pupil premium children are making more progress than non-pupil premium children and the gaps have closed considerably.
Needs analysis will continue to identify and prioritise individual children and Pupil Progress meetings will continue to monitor the progress of individual pupils and focus on removing the barriers to learning by effectively mapping provision.
Pupil Premium Strategy
At Mill Lane Primary School, we have high aspirations and ambitions for your children and we believe that no child should be left behind. We strongly believe that it is not about where our children come from but their passion and thirst for knowledge, and their dedication and commitment to learning that make the difference between success and failure. We are determined to ensure that the children of Mill Lane are given every chance to realise their full potential. Our school moto is, ‘We are unique and together we create a global family. Shoot for the moon and you’ll land amongst the stars.’
We seek to ensure that every child has the best possible start to their education, that barriers to learning are removed and that every child has the opportunity to reach their full potential. We see every child as an individual, but recognise that our school community has a diverse range of needs:
- 65% of our children are learning English as an additional language (EAL);
- Some of our children are new to the country and have never had any previous schooling;
- We have a highly mobile population, meaning that many children do not stay with us throughout their whole primary education;
- Many of our children with SEN have difficulties with speech, language and communication;
- The school serves an area of high social deprivation;
- Many children have multiple vulnerabilities.
47% of our pupils attract extra funding through the Pupil Premium Grant (PPG), as well as 53% who are entitled to the Early Years PPG. The government provides this additional funding to schools in order to help them to address the barriers to learning. It is for each school to decide how this money should be spent, in order to meet the specific needs of the children in the school. Due to the large percentage of pupils who attract additional funding at Mill Lane, in many cases we are focusing on enhancing provision to meet the needs of all children. In these cases, the Pupil Premium is used in proportionately.
Barriers to learning include:
- Language and vocabulary deficit
- Limited social and cultural experience, ambition and aspiration
- Mobility
- Social deprivation
- Extended leave
- Social and emotional barriers
- Poverty including ‘working poor’
- Lower than average starting points
- Health is in the lower 10% nationally for categories such as oral health
- Undervalue education
At Mill Lane, we use the PPG to address six main objectives:
- Early intervention: this approach ensures that the school is able to work with children and families to address needs as soon as possible;
- Attendance: educational achievement requires good attendance;
- Special Educational Needs: additional specialist resources;
- Academic achievement: additional teaching and resources to promote progress for all, including support for parents to promote progress for all;
- Participation: provision of resources to ensure that no child is unable to take part in any activity because of financial disadvantage;
- Resilience: a school-wide focus on developing a growth mindset, ensuring that our children learn how to overcome barriers for themselves.
The impact of spending from the PPG is regularly reviewed by the Governing Body. The dates for review this year are:
- 23rd October 2018
- 26th February 2019
- 4th June 2019
Pupil Premium Allocation 2018-2019
The Pupil Premium grant is a government initiative of an additional allocation of funding designed for schools to address current inequalities and tackle disadvantage by supporting the attainment and progress of specific groups of children who are vulnerable to possible underachievement. The Government are not dictating how schools should spend this money, but are clear that schools will need to employ the strategies that they know will support their pupils to increase their attainment. In order to receive this additional funding, as a school we are required to provide information to the Department for Education confirming which children meet the government criteria:
The Pupil Premium Grant per pupil for 2018 to 2019 is as follows:
Disadvantaged pupils | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 free school meals | £1,320 |
Pupils in years 7 to 11 recorded as Ever 6 FSM | £935 |
Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority | £2,300 |
Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order
The Early Years Pupil Premium (EYPP) gives providers additional funding to support disadvantaged three and four year old pupils |
£2,300
£300 |
Service children | Pupil premium per pupil |
Pupils in year groups reception to year 11 recorded as Ever 6 service child or in receipt of a child pension from the Ministry of Defence | £300 |
Education & Skills Funding Agency
To be eligible for free school meals you must be in receipt of the appropriate benefits and have submitted an application for free school meals to the Local Authority Benefits Team (details of which are available from the school office).
If you qualify for the appropriate benefits, but have chosen not to apply for free school meals, please consider applying. You do not have to take up the free school meal to attract the funding. Free school meals cannot be backdated, so you should only apply if you currently qualify.
Our Philosophy and Principles
We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all pupils to succeed and to provide the necessary interventions to ensure that success is experienced by all. We ensure that
- Teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of all pupils
- Appropriate provision is made for pupils who belong to vulnerable groups, this includes ensuring that the needs of disadvantaged pupils are adequately assessed and addressed
- we recognise that not all pupils who receive free school meals will be disadvantaged
- We also recognise that not all pupils who are disadvantaged are registered or qualify for free school meals
- We reserve the right to allocate the Pupil Premium funding to support any pupil or groups of pupils the school has legitimately identified as being disadvantaged
- Pupil premium funding will be allocated following data analysis and pupil progress meetings which identify priority classes, groups or individuals.
- Children experience quality first teaching, meeting the needs of each individual child
- Every child reaches or exceeds age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics
- No child is disadvantaged due to inability to pay for school trips, residential visits, music tuition or other extra-curricular activities
- Pupil Premium funding is allocated after a needs analysis and exploration of what research tells us to provide the most appropriate support and intervention for pupils
Pupil Premium Grant Allocation
2018-19 | 106 pupils | £139,920 |
2017-18 | 103 pupils | £135,960 |
2016-17 | 105 pupils | £144,180 |
2015-16 | 108 pupils | £142,560 |
2014-15 | 115 pupils | £149,500 |
Early Years Pupil Premium Grant Allocation
2018-19 | Details available February 2019 | |
2017-18 | 8 pupils | £2,500 |
2016-17 | 24 pupils | £7,200 |
Dates of Pupil Premium Reviews
23rd October 2018
26th February 2019
4th June 2019
AMBITION FOR DISADVANTAGED PUPILS IN OUR SCHOOL – SUCCESS CRITERIA Barriers to learning will be removed and children in Mill Lane will achieve their full potential · Academic achievement (66%) · Early intervention (59%) · Special Educational Needs (36%) · Attendance (27%) · Participation (21%) C = Cohort, including ARP children · Resilience, emotional health and well-being (14%) M = Mainstream children only |
||||
Supporting rationale and research for chosen action: · Education Endowment Fund * (See p8 & 9) · Higher Achievement Research Transforming Tees ** · Effective Practice Case Study: St Bede’s Primary School, Stockton *** |
||||
MAIN OBJECTIVES | ACTION TO ADDRESS BARRIER | PLANNED IMPACT | MONITORING OF EFFECTIVENESS | AMOUNT ALLOCATED |
Academic achievement and early intervention
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2018 Improved outcomes
|
The employment of an additional 0.6 teacher employed in KS2 to enable Year 6 children to be taught in smaller groups *
The employment of an additional 0.5 teacher (DH) in Y2 to enable children to be taught in smaller groups *
The allocation of an additional TA in year 1 to enable adults to provide more high quality 1:1 feedback and feedforward to pupils *
The allocation of an additional TA in Reception to enable EYFS interventions*
The employment of a TA in EY & KS1 to support speech, language & communication including oral language and semantics and learning interventions identified in Pupil Progress Meetings
The allocation of 1.6 highly trained TAs to develop and deliver high quality early intervention and support with early SALT provision and self-care *
*Booster Reading \programme throughout school including Mid-day supervisor overtime to support 1:1 reading (BRP trained), and voluntary Right to Read Programme with Johnson Matthey, Youth for Christ and volunteer readers.
PiXL intervention
Membership of the EEF and Literacy Campaign * |
All children to have access to Quality First Teaching raise attainment and rates of progress
Children to have access to support to plug gaps in learning and to pre-teach to enable children to access age appropriate curriculum
Children to have access reading intervention and individual pupil support as required
All pupils have a balanced curriculum and specific interventions delivered by expert practitioners which will lead to improved outcomes
Improved outcomes
Improved reading outcomes Promote a love of reading at home
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved outcomes
|
Improved KS2 outcomes
Improved KS1 outcomes
Improved Y1 phonics outcomes
Improved EY GLD outcomes
Improved outcomes, Increased vocabulary. Improved listening skills language and understanding.
Improved outcomes
Children’s confidence in and enjoyment of reading increases. Children make good progress in reading.
|
£10,280
£11,300
£4,880
£10,230
£13,860
£17,900
£12,100
£1,680
£550
|
Special Educational Needs
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2018 Reduce waiting times for specialist support Regular monitoring of progress
|
The employment of an additional Speech and Language Therapist *
The allocation of an Educational Psychologist to ensure faster access to services |
Children’s speech and language development is supported and any barriers are addressed which will impact on their wider attainment, self-esteem and self-confidence
Children have access to specialist assessment and support |
Early identification of children with Special Educational Needs who require specialist support Regular monitoring of progress Increase staff expertise in supporting children with SEN
|
£11,200
£5,500 |
Attendance – with specific focus on Persistent absence
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2018 Persistent absence improves to be in line with national average
|
Attendance review and Incentives to improve attendance 100% weekly attendance treats 100% term attendance vouchers 100% year attendance trip |
Increased attendance of all groups which will impact on attainment and progress |
Weekly monitoring or particular children
Half termly data collections |
£2,000 |
Participation
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2018 100% participation in visits
|
Subsidise parental contributions to enable all children to access enrichment activities including educational visits, theatre visits and residential opportunities
Purchase uniform sweatshirts, PE Kits and Book bags
|
Children can access visits to support their learning across the curriculum which will enhance children’s learning experiences which will enhance their knowledge and understanding of the curriculum
Children develop a range of life skills and experiences and develop a love of learning
To ensure that poverty proofing enables all children to participate fully in education and does not feel discriminated against
|
Children have opportunities to participate in a wide range of events and visits.
Children wear school uniform with pride. Through all aspects of school, children consistently display good attitudes to learning, respect for school and the core values |
£9,920
£9,520
|
Resilience, emotional health and well-
Progress to date
Intended Outcomes by July 2018 Parents can access support from other agencies being |
Parent Support Advisor(PSA), Julie Cole, to work with our more vulnerable families on: Attendance, Safeguarding (Child Protection and Early Help) and Emotional well being
Provide a family counselling service for vulnerable pupils to enable a greater range and depth of issues faced by children and families to be tackled
2 members of staff to specialise in attachment training
1 member of staff to train to become a Wellbeing Champion
|
Stability of key children, enabling them to attend, be ready to learn and be emotionally supported. Families have access to an identified adult who can advise them and help them access support from other agencies.
Children have access to emotional support and counselling
Specialist knowledge and practice in school to support
Specialist knowledge and practice in school to support
|
Early identification of families who require additional support through Early Help
Children’s emotional presentation improves so that they are ready for learning.
Reduce barrier to learning
Reduce barrier to learning |
£12,000
£5,000
£1800
£200
|
£137,960
EEF Research
Evidence Statement | Evidence Strength | Actions Implemented | Date | By Whom | Impact |
Develop pupils’ speaking and listening skills and wider understanding of language | Extensive |
· Tracks to Literacy Scheme introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Talk Boost intervention delivered by KS1 additional TA. · Additional EAL training to help develop vocabulary · Became a Talk for Learning School |
Autumn 2
Autumn 1 and ongoing Spring 1 |
SENCo
EAL Advisor |
TAs are reporting greater increase in confidence in pupils but cannot measure quantitatively at this point. |
Use a balanced and engaging approach to developing reading, which integrates both decoding and comprehension skills | Extensive |
· RWI books introduced into KS1. · New guided reading scheme introduced so that have access to more challenging resources. · New reading scheme purchased to promote enjoyment of reading at home. · Introduction of Cracking Comprehension · Booster Reading Programme : A system is now in place across school so that all classes receive 1:1 reading support from trained adults throughout the week · Reading Plus introduced |
Spring 1 Spring 2016
Spring 1
Autumn 2 Autumn 1 |
English Lead
HT Right 2 Read, Youth 4 Christ, MDS. |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Effectively implement a systematic phonics programme | Very Extensive |
· RWI introduced to EYFS and KS1. · Whole school staff training to ensure that all staff understand the principles behind effective phonics teaching |
Spring 1 | English lead, KI (Phonics Lead) | · After testing Yr 1 pupils, phonics projections at 69%; Yr 2 re-check at 50%. |
Teach pupils strategies for developing and monitoring their reading comprehension | Extensive |
· Introduction of Cracking Comprehension across school, with training. · All staff received inference and deduction training as part of PD Day · All teaching staff have received Reciprocal reading training. |
Autumn 2
Autumn1
Autumn 1 and 2 |
HT
HT |
Reading Predictions: Y2 64% (M) 55% (C) Rec 59%(M) 55% (C)
|
Teach pupils strategies for planning and monitoring their writing | Moderate |
· Introduction of BIG Write across school · PD Day on effective marking, editing and proof reading of children’s writing |
Autumn 1
Spring 2 |
English Lead HT |
Writing predictions: Rec 59% (M) 55% (C) Y1 63%(M) 58% (C) Y2 61% (M) 52% (C) |
Promote fluent written transcription skills by encouraging extensive and effective practise and explicitly teaching spelling | Limited | · Year 2+ have access to the RWI spelling programme to ensure all spelling patterns are taught across school. | Autumn 2 | English Lead | |
Use high quality information about pupils current capabilities to select the best next steps for teaching | Moderate |
· Regular pupil progress meetings held after assessment week to monitor progress and discuss next steps for pupils who appear ‘stuck’ · Wellbeing Champion · 2 Attachment specialists |
On-going | HT | Teachers more accountable for pupil’s progress and discussions re interventions and new strategies for pupils falling behind take place. |
Use high-quality structured interventions to help pupils who are struggling with their literacy | Extensive |
· Talk Boost, Tracks to Literacy, 1:1 RWI phonics intervention carried out on pupils identified after pupil’s progress meetings or assessments. · Introduce PiXL across KS1 and KS2 · Master Maths Hub school |
On-going | TAs, Phonics lead | TA feedback to T effectiveness of these programmes. This is again monitored to ensure that chn are making grounds as a result of interventions during PPMeetings. |
2018-19 Spending Review
Impact and lessons learned
Academic achievement and early intervention
The Pupil Premium funding allocation was spent according to plan. There were no variations. Extra costs were covered by the school budget.
NB When reading data please bear in mind that up to 21% in each cohort is made up of children accessing the Speech, Language and Communication provision from across the authority and this typically means a corresponding proportion unlikely to achieve at age-related standards.
‘National Other’ means non disadvantaged.
Early Years
At their first statutory assessment, there is clear evidence of low levels of development for many of our pupil premium children. Early Years pupils have been specifically targeted to reduce the barriers to learning and progress.
57% of Reception pupils are disadvantaged (9% more than 2018) – 17 pupils (6 boys and 11 girls).
Despite the low starting points and high number of disadvantaged pupils 71% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the GLD (an increase of 21%). Nationally, 73% of non-disadvantaged pupils achieved the GLD. Therefore, there is an achievement gap of just 2% (this has narrowed by 20%). 71% is just 1% below the national average for all pupils and 15% above the national average for disadvantaged pupils 56%.
Y1 Phonics
54% of pupils are disadvantaged – 15 pupils (11 boys and 4 girls). There is a significantly higher number of boys (almost 3:1). Many in the disadvantaged group are SEN.
53% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the standard which is significantly below ‘Other’ pupils nationally. Therefore, there is an achievement gap has widened to -31%, an increase of 28%. It is also 17% below disadvantaged pupils nationally.
National disadvantaged is 70%. The performance of disadvantaged pupils in school is 11% higher than disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has closed by 12%.
58% of pupils are Disadvantaged (an increase of 11%) – 18 pupils (8 boys and 10 girls).
Reading
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard (an increase of 20%) compared to 78% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of -22% which has closed by 21%. National disadvantaged is 60% so Disadvantaged pupils are just below disadvantaged pupils nationally by 4%. This has narrowed by 12%.
Writing
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard, an increase of 27%, compared to 73% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 17%. This has narrowed by 27%. National disadvantaged is 53%. Disadvantaged pupils have outperformed disadvantaged pupils nationally by 3%. This has narrowed by 27%.
Maths
56% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard, an increase of 20%, compared to 79% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 23%. This has narrowed by 20%. National disadvantaged is 61%. Disadvantaged pupils are below disadvantaged pupils nationally by just 5%. This has narrowed by 13%.
KS1 Progress
EYFS 2017 – KS1 2019
In Reading 89% of disadvantaged and 100% of non-disadvantaged children converted from GLD Standard in EYFS to Standard in KS1. Both are above the national average of 87%.
In Writing 90% of disadvantaged and 100% of non-disadvantaged children converted from GLD Standard in EYFS to Standard in KS1. Both are above the national average of 84%.
In Maths 100% of disadvantaged and 86% of non-disadvantaged children converted from GLD Standard in EYFS to Standard in KS1. Both are above or very close to the national average of 87%.
By the end of primary school the impact of pupil premium spending in Mill Lane is evident in the attainment and progress of pupil premium children.
In 2019, 71% (well above the school figure of 42% and the LA average of 27%)of Y6 pupils were Disadvantaged, 20 pupils (5 boys and 15 girls).
SPaG
65% of disadvantaged pupils, an increase of 9%, achieved the expected standard compared to 83% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 18%. This has narrowed by 8%. National disadvantaged is 67%. Disadvantaged pupils are just 2% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 8%.
Reading
50% of disadvantaged pupils, the same as last year, achieved the expected standard compared to 78% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 28%. This has narrowed by 2%. National disadvantaged is 62%. Disadvantaged pupils are 12% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has widened by 2% as the national figure dropped by 2%.
Writing
60% of disadvantaged pupils, an increase of 4%, achieved the expected standard compared to 83% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 23%. This has narrowed by 4%. National disadvantaged is 68%. Disadvantaged pupils are 8% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 2%.
Maths
60% of disadvantaged pupils, an increase of 4%, achieved the expected standard compared to 84% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 24%. This has narrowed by 1%. National disadvantaged is 67%. Disadvantaged pupils are 7% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This is the same as last year.
RWM
45% of disadvantaged pupils, an increase of 7%, achieved the expected standard compared to 71% of ‘Other’ pupils Nationally. There is an achievement gap of 26%. This has narrowed by 7%. National disadvantaged is 51%. Disadvantaged pupils are 6% below Disadvantaged pupils nationally. This has narrowed by 7%.
KS2 Progress
Nationally, Between -0.5 and +0.5 is considered to be expected average progress.
Reading
Disadvantaged pupils (-0.4) made expected progress. This has decreased slightly by 0.3 but is still significantly higher than progress in 2017 (-1.33).
Non-Disadvantaged children made significant progress (+2.98). This has increased significantly since 2017 from -4.13.
Writing
Disadvantaged pupils (-0.23) made expected progress. This has increased by 0.69. Disadvantaged children made better progress than Non-Disadvantaged children (-2.97).
Math
Disadvantaged children (+0.9) made more than expected progress.
Non-Disadvantaged children made significant progress (+2.67). This has increased significantly since 2017 from -2.47.
Participation
100% of children, whether pupil premium or non-pupil premium participated in educational visits and there was no difference in the percentage of children participating in residentials or extra-curricular activities.
Resilience, emotional health and well-being
80% of children who accessed counselling reached age related expectations and the other 20% reached their personal targets.
Attendance
2017-18
2018-19
Attendance of non-pupil premium (Y1-Y6) children remained the same at 95.7% and attendance of pupil premium (Y1-Y6) children dropped slightly from 94.7% to 94.6%.
Persistent Absence of both non-pupil premium and pupil premium (Y1-Y6) children has significantly improved.
Persistent Absence of Non-pupil premium children has improved from 13.2% to 10.4% and 17.5% to 14.5% for pupil premium children.
Lessons Learned
Levels of deprivation at Mill Lane are considerably higher than nationally and the proportion of pupil premium children is considerably higher than national figures. A significant number of other children live in families who are just above the threshold (working-poor) and a significant number of other children are refugees and are not eligible for pupil premium funding but are in the lowest 5% in the country for deprivation. When planning the budget, including pupil premium spending, we work extremely hard to ensure that the maximum number of pupils benefit from pupil premium funding and that no child is discriminated against.
By the time children leave Mill Lane Disadvantaged are making expected progress and attainment is improving. Attainment is just below that of all children (now within 7%). In writing, Disadvantaged children are outperforming Non Disadvantaged children by 4% and attainment is similar in SPAG.
The progress of Disadvantaged pupils, from their low starting points, is very pleasing.
Gaps are narrowing against national average and national other, including gender differences.
Whilst the plan to target specific older pupils across school continues to work, the plan to put funding into targeting younger children for early intervention and rapid progress is also working and will continue next year. Identifying then removing/reducing the barriers early means that children are able to access the curriculum for their year group sooner and more effectively. This prepares them for their next stage of education.
Needs analysis will continue to identify and prioritise individual children and Pupil Progress meetings will continue to monitor the attainment and progress of individual pupils and focus on removing the barriers to learning by effectively mapping provision.
Staff continue to reflect on poverty proofing across school. For example, staff monitor the percentage of Disadvantaged children accessing extra-curricular activities, including residentials, to ensure equality of provision throughout the school.